If someone asked me to complete a cruise on a Soviet-built nuclear
submarine, I would reply that Bill Gates and Warren Buffet together do not half
the amount of money it would take for me to run that risk. Not only are catastrophic accidents all too
common in the former Soviet submarine fleet, radiation leaks are so common and
so severe that the hazardous pay premium that soviet sailors on those vessels
receive is properly referred to “childlessness pay.” On the other hand, I had
absolutely no problem at all spending two months on board a nuclear powered
U.S. Navy vessel. I taught History and
English on board the USS George Washington CVN-73 from July to September, of
1994. Similarly, I would have no safety
concerns whatsoever about riding on an American nuclear sub. I once asked my brother Bruce if his
opposition to nuclear power extended to the nuclear Navy. When he said, “yes,” I politely asked him if
he’d given any thought to the cost of replacing ten Nimitz-class carriers (which
go for several billion dollars apiece). He had no response. The U.S. Navy has commissioned about 190
nuclear submarines and we haven’t lost one since the Scorpion in 1968. I’d say, “You’re in a whole lot more danger driving
on any American highway than you are on a Rickover-designed submarine.” The
total number of accident-free reactor years the U.S. Navy has amassed now
exceeds 5,000 — a period longer than the pyramids have been standing.
Thursday, January 23, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment